Qura'n Needs To Be
Re-Interpreted To Reflect The True Spirit Of Islam
Friday, April 12, 2002
By: Tashbih Sayyed
Osama bin Laden's father Muhammad bin Laden never kept more than
four wives at one time because he did not want to violate the sanctions
of his faith - Islam - as prescribed in its holy book, the Quran.
But his faith did not stop him from marrying more than fifty women.
All he had to do is divorce one of his four wives and replace her
with a new one whenever he chose. Saudi interpreters of the holy
book told him that it was permissible.
Recently, a girls school in Mecca caught fire where more than ten
girls were killed because the members of the Commission for Promoting
Virtue and Preventing Vice (Religious police) forced the girls to
stay inside the burning building. These girls were not wearing abayas
(black gowns) and head-scarves so they weren't supposed to be in
public. The interpretation of the Quran Saudi authorities follow
do not allow any exception to the rule.
A Videotape in current circulation follows a Palestinian mother
preparing her son for a suicide bombing mission and saying that
if she had one hundred sons, she would send them all to kill the
Jews. The Quran that she has been taught sanctifies suicide and
the murder of innocent people.
The regional conflicts and territorial disputes in Kashmir, Palestine,
Afghanistan etc. are being termed in the Muslim world as Jihad (holy
war). The people being dying in its name are being honored as shaheeds
(martyrs). This is because the Muslim clergy feels free to interpret
Islam's holy book any which way they like to justify their political
causes.
In Pakistan, minority Shias, Christians, Ahmadis, Hindus and others
are murdered every day and places of worship are regularly attacked
because the Muslim perpetrators and murderers believe that their
holy book commands such barbaric conduct in the name of the Muslim
community (ummah).
The above snapshots are a small example of recent events in the
Muslim world currently intriguing non-Muslims and getting them to
ask, "What is Islam?". Westerners do not know that these
deeds do not reflect the true spirit of Islam. Rather, that they
are the result of an age old effort by a static Muslim clergy, who
use the Quran to create narrow-minded populous, which can then be
manipulated to achieve their own particular political ends.
Pointing the finger at the clergy does not mean that religion can
be ignored if the Muslim world is to move in a new direction. We
all acknowledge that while the human mind matures, it constantly
looks for guidance and tutoring from persons and institutions it
considers more learned than itself in matters of moral, cultural
and religious affairs. And nowhere does this dependence more glaring
than in the matters of religion. Traditionally, there are two ways
to seek this guidance, first, directly from the source - the religious
documents - and second, from the clergy who have taken upon themselves
to authoritatively interpret scripture.
But Islam never made room for the clergy. Allah ( God ), wants
to have a direct relationship with his creation, without the meddling
of the middleman (Clergy). In order to empower the individual, God
commanded them to "Read". Iqra or read, was the first
word conveyed to the Prophet Muhammad himself. This emphasis on
seeking knowledge for human beings was a divine plan meant to free
men and women from the clutches of the clergy. Allah knew that the
middleman could never convey the real meaning of his divine message
because they were working for themselves or their rulers first,
not God.
The traditional power structures of the Islamic world were rooted
in a battle between rulers and clergy vying for influence over the
common man. The rulers and clergy joined hands in the end to ensure
that the common man could never equip himself with the knowledge
to interpret the Allah's message himself. Once the ruler - clergy
nexus succeeded in keeping the Muslim masses uneducated, it brainwashed
them into believing that not only the holy book is divine but the
clergy's interpretation of the holy book is also divine. And anybody
not following the interpretation will sure taste hell-fire.
In the words of Professor R. B. Perry, "A book does not become
a man's "bible" unless it has been the principal quickening
influence in his spiritual life and the source of his illumination,
so that he returns to it when he needs to reanimate his purposes
or confirm his belief." According to this thought a holy book
, "is the proved remedy to which a man confidently resorts
for the health of his own soul. It becomes associated in his mind
with all that he owes to it, and all that he hopes from it; so that
it is not only an instrument, but a symbol." But if we look
at Muslim actions today it does not seem to be the case. Muslim
deeds do not seem to reflect the divine message but are rather products
of its misinterpretation. In the Muslim world, men and women, are
being misguided by the misinterpretations that have become more
sacrosanct than Quraa'n.
Until recently, the prevalent corrupted version of Islam was considered
a threat only to Muslims, but after September 11, 2002, Muslims
came under very tight scrutiny and have become a concern to everyone.
Muslims everywhere are a target of scorn, ridicule and contempt.
Muslims can deal with the situation in two ways. First, Muslims
can continue to blame a "wide spread Judeo-Christian conspiracy"
for their sorry state of affairs. Or, second, they can start following
the educated and civilized values found in the Quran and Islam itself.
As long as the killings of Jews, Christians, Hindus and other Muslim
groups are justified by crude interpretations of the Quran, Muslims
are letting Islam die. For its sake and for the sake of civilization,
Muslims will have to challenge each and every interpretation of
the Quran that is in conflict with the values of common decency,
respect, and humanity.
Never has an interpreter of the Quran been divinely sanctioned,
nor any of his interpretations. All interpretations are open to
criticism. Only the Quran is divine and divinity can never be in
clash with civilization.
|